BASEMARK OS SCORE OF TECLAST X16 PRO & COMPARISION TO OTHER TOP DEVICES

BASEMARK OS SCORE OF TECLAST X16 PRO & COMPARISION TO OTHER TOP DEVICES

TechTablets Forums Teclast Forums X16 Pro / X16 Power Forum BASEMARK OS SCORE OF TECLAST X16 PRO & COMPARISION TO OTHER TOP DEVICES

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #24931
    sunil
    Participant
    • Posts: 12

    Now after using my TECLAST pro, here are  benchmarks of my tablet.

    Benchmark Suite, Methodology And System Specs

    Benchmark Suite
    Android test line-up comprises six key sections: CPU, Web, GPU, GPGPU, Display and Battery.

    1. HTML5 And JavaScript Benchmarks —JSBench, BaPCO Tabletmark, Kraken 1.1,Google Octane V2,WebXPRT
    2. CPU Core Benchmarks —AnTuTu X (Anti-Detection), Basemark OS II Full (Anti-Detection), Geekbench 3 Pro (Anti-Detection), MobileXPRT 2013
    3. GPU Core Benchmarks —3DMark (Anti-Detection), Basemark X 1.1 Full (Anti-Detection), GFXBench 3.0 Corporate
    4. GPGPU Benchmarks —-CompuBenchRS

    Battery Tests Basemark —OS II Full (Anti-Detection), BatteryXPRT 2014, GFXBench 3.0 Corporate

    Basemark OS II Full (Anti-Detection)

    Basemark OS II is an all-in-one tool designed for measuring overall performance of mobile devices. It scores each device in four main categories: System, Memory, Graphics and Web. The System score reflects CPU and memory performance, specifically testing integer and floating-point math, along with single- and multi-core CPU image processing using a 2048×2048-pixel, 32-bit image. Measuring the transfer rate of the internal NAND storage (Memory) is done by reading and writing files with a fixed size, files varying from 65KB to 16MB, and files in a fragmented memory scenario. Calculating the Graphics score involves mixing 2D/3D graphics inside the same scene, applying several pixel shader effects, and displaying 100 particles with a single draw call to test GPU vertex operations. The benchmark is rendered at 1920×1080 off-screen 100 times before being displayed on-screen. Finally, the Web score stresses the CPU by performing 3D transformations and object resizing with CSS, and also includes an HTML5 Canvas particle physics test.

    Impressive performance for My Tablet that is ATOM X5.

    Basemark OS II Overall(Overall Score- Higher is better)

    1. Apple iPad Air 2- 1,919
    2. NVIDIA SHIELD Tablet-        1,490
    3. Apple iPhone 6 Plus-              1,474
    4. Apple iPhone 6 –      1,424
    5. MY DEVICE ( X16 PRO)       1303
    6. Samsung Galaxy Note 4 –           1,257
    7. Apple iPad Air                            1,133
    8. Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 8.4       1,068
    9. Apple iPad Mimi Retina Display     1,054
    10. Apple iPhone 5s         1,045
    11. ASUS MeMO Pad 7 (ME176C) 968
    12. Samsung Galaxy Note 3        968
    13. Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5      835
    14. Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4     822
    15. NVIDIA SHIELD      704
    16. Google Nexus 7(2013)      696
    17. Apple iPad 4 –   629
    18. Huwaei Ascend Mate 2 –   495
    19. ASUS Transformer Pad ( TF701T) – 494

    Basemark OS II System(Overall Score- Higher is better)

    1. Apple iPad Air 2 3032
    2. Apple iPhone 6 Plus     2082
    3. Apple iPad Air    2060
    4. Apple iPhone 6    2058
    5. MY DEVICE ( X16 PRO)  1886
    6. Apple iPhone 5s   1823
    7. Apple iPad Mimi Retina Display     1811
    8. Samsung Galaxy Note 4    1658
    9. Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 8.4    1505
    10. ASUS Transformer Pad ( TF701T)   1479
    11. Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5      1460
    12. Samsung Galaxy Note 3       1459
    13. Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4       1370
    14. NVIDIA SHIELD 1340
    15. Apple iPad 4    1282
    16. ASUS MeMo Pad 7     1254
    17. NVIDIA SHIELD Tablet    1243
    18. Google Nexus 7(2013)   1064
    19. Huwaei Ascend Mate 2     1038

    DEVICE Basemark OS II Memory(Overall Score- Higher is better)

    1. MY DEVICE ( X16 PRO)  1017
    2. ASUS MeMO Pad 7 (ME176C)   969
    3. NVIDIA SHIELD  850
    4. Apple iPhone 6 Plus 847
    5. Apple iPhone 6 820
    6. Apple iPad Air 2 767
    7. NVIDIA SHIELD Tablet  607
    8. Samsung Galaxy Note 4  604
    9. Apple iPad Air  566
    10. Apple iPad Mimi Retina Display    490
    11. Samsung Galaxy Note 3  485
    12. Huwaei Ascend Mate 2  475
    13. Apple iPhone 5s  454
    14. Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 8.4    438
    15. ASUS Transformer Pad ( TF701T)    413
    16. Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5     403
    17. Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4      396
    18. Apple iPad 4      364
    19. Google Nexus 7(2013)    217

    Impressive performance by my device  scoring top rank in memory part and good performance overall.

    #24933
    sunil
    Participant
    • Posts: 12

    WebXPRT

    Principled Technologies’ WebXPRT  is an HTML5-based benchmark that simulates common productivity tasks traditionally handled by locally-installed applications, including photo editing, financial charting and offline note-taking.

    Web XPRT ( Chrome ,Safari, IE)(Overall Score- Higher is better)

    It scored 135 in WEB XPRT 2015 which was similar to Google pixel and is a great score.See the green bar in chart where my device stands.

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    #24935
    sunil
    Participant
    • Posts: 12

    KRAKEN 1.1

    It scored 4499 in Kraken 1.1 which is just close to the score of GOOGLE PIXEL C.Not a bad score.In the chart it is represented by the red bar.Am quite happy to see that.

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    #24937
    sunil
    Participant
    • Posts: 12

    GOOGLE OCTANE V2 SCORE

    It scored 7304 in google octane v2 just close to NIVIDA SHEILD TABLET.Good Score.In the chart,the green bar denotes where it stands.

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Lost Password

Skip to toolbar