TechTablets › Forums › Teclast Forums › X16 Pro / X16 Power Forum › BASEMARK OS SCORE OF TECLAST X16 PRO & COMPARISION TO OTHER TOP DEVICES
- This topic has 3 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 10 years, 6 months ago by
sunil.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 4, 2016 at 9:57 am #24931
Now after using my TECLAST pro, here are benchmarks of my tablet.
Benchmark Suite, Methodology And System Specs
Benchmark Suite
Android test line-up comprises six key sections: CPU, Web, GPU, GPGPU, Display and Battery.- HTML5 And JavaScript Benchmarks —JSBench, BaPCO Tabletmark, Kraken 1.1,Google Octane V2,WebXPRT
- CPU Core Benchmarks —AnTuTu X (Anti-Detection), Basemark OS II Full (Anti-Detection), Geekbench 3 Pro (Anti-Detection), MobileXPRT 2013
- GPU Core Benchmarks —3DMark (Anti-Detection), Basemark X 1.1 Full (Anti-Detection), GFXBench 3.0 Corporate
- GPGPU Benchmarks —-CompuBenchRS
Battery Tests Basemark —OS II Full (Anti-Detection), BatteryXPRT 2014, GFXBench 3.0 Corporate
Basemark OS II Full (Anti-Detection)
Basemark OS II is an all-in-one tool designed for measuring overall performance of mobile devices. It scores each device in four main categories: System, Memory, Graphics and Web. The System score reflects CPU and memory performance, specifically testing integer and floating-point math, along with single- and multi-core CPU image processing using a 2048×2048-pixel, 32-bit image. Measuring the transfer rate of the internal NAND storage (Memory) is done by reading and writing files with a fixed size, files varying from 65KB to 16MB, and files in a fragmented memory scenario. Calculating the Graphics score involves mixing 2D/3D graphics inside the same scene, applying several pixel shader effects, and displaying 100 particles with a single draw call to test GPU vertex operations. The benchmark is rendered at 1920×1080 off-screen 100 times before being displayed on-screen. Finally, the Web score stresses the CPU by performing 3D transformations and object resizing with CSS, and also includes an HTML5 Canvas particle physics test.
Impressive performance for My Tablet that is ATOM X5.
Basemark OS II Overall(Overall Score- Higher is better)
- Apple iPad Air 2- 1,919
- NVIDIA SHIELD Tablet- 1,490
- Apple iPhone 6 Plus- 1,474
- Apple iPhone 6 – 1,424
- MY DEVICE ( X16 PRO) 1303
- Samsung Galaxy Note 4 – 1,257
- Apple iPad Air 1,133
- Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 8.4 1,068
- Apple iPad Mimi Retina Display 1,054
- Apple iPhone 5s 1,045
- ASUS MeMO Pad 7 (ME176C) 968
- Samsung Galaxy Note 3 968
- Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 835
- Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4 822
- NVIDIA SHIELD 704
- Google Nexus 7(2013) 696
- Apple iPad 4 – 629
- Huwaei Ascend Mate 2 – 495
- ASUS Transformer Pad ( TF701T) – 494
Basemark OS II System(Overall Score- Higher is better)
- Apple iPad Air 2 3032
- Apple iPhone 6 Plus 2082
- Apple iPad Air 2060
- Apple iPhone 6 2058
- MY DEVICE ( X16 PRO) 1886
- Apple iPhone 5s 1823
- Apple iPad Mimi Retina Display 1811
- Samsung Galaxy Note 4 1658
- Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 8.4 1505
- ASUS Transformer Pad ( TF701T) 1479
- Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 1460
- Samsung Galaxy Note 3 1459
- Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4 1370
- NVIDIA SHIELD 1340
- Apple iPad 4 1282
- ASUS MeMo Pad 7 1254
- NVIDIA SHIELD Tablet 1243
- Google Nexus 7(2013) 1064
- Huwaei Ascend Mate 2 1038
DEVICE Basemark OS II Memory(Overall Score- Higher is better)
- MY DEVICE ( X16 PRO) 1017
- ASUS MeMO Pad 7 (ME176C) 969
- NVIDIA SHIELD 850
- Apple iPhone 6 Plus 847
- Apple iPhone 6 820
- Apple iPad Air 2 767
- NVIDIA SHIELD Tablet 607
- Samsung Galaxy Note 4 604
- Apple iPad Air 566
- Apple iPad Mimi Retina Display 490
- Samsung Galaxy Note 3 485
- Huwaei Ascend Mate 2 475
- Apple iPhone 5s 454
- Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 8.4 438
- ASUS Transformer Pad ( TF701T) 413
- Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 403
- Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4 396
- Apple iPad 4 364
- Google Nexus 7(2013) 217
Impressive performance by my device scoring top rank in memory part and good performance overall.
February 4, 2016 at 10:23 am #24933WebXPRT
Principled Technologies’ WebXPRT is an HTML5-based benchmark that simulates common productivity tasks traditionally handled by locally-installed applications, including photo editing, financial charting and offline note-taking.
Web XPRT ( Chrome ,Safari, IE)(Overall Score- Higher is better)
It scored 135 in WEB XPRT 2015 which was similar to Google pixel and is a great score.See the green bar in chart where my device stands.
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.February 4, 2016 at 10:37 am #24935KRAKEN 1.1
It scored 4499 in Kraken 1.1 which is just close to the score of GOOGLE PIXEL C.Not a bad score.In the chart it is represented by the red bar.Am quite happy to see that.
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.February 4, 2016 at 10:49 am #24937 -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

