comparing lower cost Intel processors

comparing lower cost Intel processors

TechTablets › Forums › General › General Discussion › comparing lower cost Intel processors

Tagged: 

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 8, 2015 at 4:58 pm #15297
    BBaker
    Participant
    • Posts: 283

    It’s interesting to look at the similarities in Intel’s processors.  Granted how they are used in various devices makes a difference… heat sinks, quality/speed of RAM and flash they are mated with, screen resolution, battery size, etc…

    Braswell vs. Cherry-Trail stats:
    Pentium N3700 CPU: turbo 2.4GHz, GPU:16-EU cores at 400mhz/700mhz(burst), ~6watts
    Atom X7 Z8700 CPU: turbo 2.4GHz, GPU:16-EU cores at 200mhz/600mhz(burst), ~2watts
    Atom X5 Z8500 CPU: turbo 2.2GHz, GPU:12-EU cores at 200mhz/600mhz(burst), ~2watts
    Celeron N3150 CPU: turbo 2.0GHz, GPU:12-EU cores at 320mhz/640mhz(burst), ~6watts
    *All 4-core, 2MB L2 cache

    November 8, 2015 at 5:08 pm #15305
    BBaker
    Participant
    • Posts: 283

    I ran down a rat hole today looking at this Acer R-11 Pentium N3700 based device.
    It looks reasonable but it’s a “convertible” not a 2-in-1 (detachable KB).  It has upgrade potential and *hopefully* can run Ubuntu v15.10 dunno yet.

    Liliputing has a review of it…


    http://liliputing.com/2015/10/acer-aspire-r11-convertible-windows-notebook-review.html

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Lost Password

Skip to toolbar